frontiers in oncology predatoryling me garmi

Therefore, these Principles, supported by different institutions, are useful for detecting deviation from best practices in publishing. Conflict of interest statement. because it is used as a proxy for both quality and integrity. Title (s): Clinics in oncology. Logically, this step requires expert knowledge in each scientific field that prevents a global analysis of the 53 journals under analysis. The author assumes responsibility for any error that may have arisen throughout the protracted, long-winded and at times somewhat artisanal data-collection process. Incorporation on the WOS and having a Journal Impact Factor provides a veneer of quality to the journal that extends to the authors that publish in it. Both publishers, Hindawi and Frontiers, were founded by a husband-and-wife team. 2015; Beall 2016; Alrawadieh 2020). Frontiers in Oncology. The physicist Ahmed Hindawi and his wife, the mathematician Nagwa Abdel-Mottaleb, started their publishing house in their home country Egypt in 1997; 10 years later they converted Hindawi to open access. Their new found legitimacy means that any citations will, in consequence, raise the productivity metrics (e.g. The most prominent and prestigious journals in a scientific field are promoted to Level 2 (publishing 20% of the literature in that field) (https://dbh.nsd.uib.no/publiseringskanaler/VedtakNiva2). I was not allowed to handle articles of authors who I'd worked with in the past (for some articles we brought in another editor we knew, for others Frontiers supplied a handling editor). Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark. Better Service At the same time, oversight of peer review is challenging, because it is rarely publicly observable (Siler 2020). A platinum/diamond open-access model might be close to an ideal academic publishing modelaccording to the terminology of Siler (2020)since it prioritizes professional rather than market logics and then eliminates the drive to publish as many articles as possible to maximize revenue. 2020). BibTeX syles are usually part of a LaTeX template. Some examples of the MDPI-journals with names similar to other journals are Cells, Cancers, Polymers, Remote Sensing, Animals and Genes, which seem remarkably similar to other journals established earlier and edited by Elsevier (Cell, Polymer, Gene, Remote Sensing of Environment), Wiley (Cancer), and Cambridge University Press (Animal). This step is greatly facilitated when a journal operates with open peer review. Figure 2: Analysis of Impact Factor and CiteScore rankings in the JCR Oncology category and CiteScore Oncology category. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. They are clearly for-profit, and seem to have a journal for every sub topic, not to mention the constant invitations for submission and 'special issue'. A Cross-Sectional Comparison, Predatory Open Access: A Longitudinal Study of Article Volumes and Market Charateristics, Is It Such a Big Deal? At the same time, if there is a lack of awareness of predatory journals among scientists, then they will evaluate those publications as if they were legitimate and may naively send papers to predatory journals. Note: When a JCR-indexed journal is ranked in more than one category, 1 its highest rank is depicted in column Q; 2 the leading journal for comparison is the one with the highest impact factor (2018) in the category where the MDPI-journal is ranked. Similar pernicious effects can be expected from citation stacking when journals cite each other to raise their impact factors (Heneberg 2016). In 2018, the case of the International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Sustainability, with self-citation rates several times higher than those of the leading journals within the same category stands out (a difference of 25.17% and 16.98%, respectively). Only in that way will the editors decisions be based on editorial reasoning rather than any covert intention to inflate citations artificially. Besides, the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishersjointly operated by The National Board of Scholarly Publishing and the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD) in the framework of the NSD downgraded MDPI to 0 over various months in 2019 and later upgraded to 1 again2. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology is a broad-scope, interdisciplinary open-access journal, focusing on the fundamental processes of life, led by Prof Amanda Fisher and supported by a geographically diverse, high-quality editorial board. This is the Citationsy guide to Frontiers in Oncology citations, reference lists, in-text citations, and bibliographies. Why Beall's blacklist of predatory journals died. JCR-indexed MDPI-journals betray both traits through a steady increase in number of their published articles (sometimes to several hundred in just one regular issue) and special issues. Thus, universities, funding institutions, or any institution that evaluates scientific activity can disincentivize the submission of manuscripts to predatory journals and the acceptance of roles on their editorial committees, ignoring these milestones in the evaluation process of a curriculum vitae (Forero et al. Moreover, the term predatory journal was found by Jeffery Beall, a librarian at the University of Colorado. Cortegiani et al. Both the increases in APC and the number of articles and special issues in JCR-indexed MDPI-journals may raise questions about the practices in use and their potential fit to these definitions. (, Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. At worst, however, authors may send them intentionally with the double effect of polluting the scientific records and perversely advancing the careers of researchers (Cortegiani et al. With respect to the formal criterion of the composition of the Editorial Board, it has not been possible to evaluate whether all the members who form part of these boards are in fact aware of their roles, due to their very high numbers (16,223 individuals), which could be approached in future research. It is important that academia and scholars become aware both of the risks of falling into the networks of predatory journals and, in addition, academics should be capable of properly identifying these journals, without presupposing that their inclusion in a prestigious database is a sort of quality hallmark that guarantees the integrity of their authorship, and both their peer-review and their editing processes (Severin and Low 2019; Cortegiani et al. The didactic explanation of Broome was as follows: The speed to publication for reputable journals is certainly longer with time from submission to first decision by the editor ranging from 4 to 12 weeks for most journals and varies even by article. The easiest way is to use a reference manager: The citation style is built in and you can choose it in Settings > Citation Style or Paperpile > Citation Style in Google Docs. The alarming increase in the number of predatory journals (from 1,800 to 8,000 over the period 20104) and the exponential growth (from 53,000 to 420,000 between 2010 and 2014) of the articles that they publish (Shen and Bjork 2015) have rendered futile any effort to keep white and blacklists updated. Selective databases, such as Scopus, PubMed, and Journal Citation Reports (JCRs), form an index of journals, a sort of whitelist that is used for the purposes of assessing researchers and taking decisions on grant funding (Cortegiani et al. Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Frontiers in Oncology formatting guidelines as mentioned in Frontiers Media author instructions. 2019). Focussing our attention on the 53 MDPI-journals under analysis, 84.9% of their websites reported that they provided a first decision within <19days. Poor Peer Review Practices. Frederic was setting up a new, online, open access, peer reviewed . Peer review is a system of safeguards which, despite its limitations, fulfils its function reasonably well of ensuring that false research, of low quality, with serious flaws or inaccurate information is not disseminated, thereby avoiding misinformation (Elmore and Weston 2020; Siler 2020). h-index) of their authors, generating inflated curricula and doped academic careers (Cortegiani, Manca and Giarratano, 2020a). These facts suggest that MDPI has been open to question, a publisher that has been moving within a grey zone. More specifically, in general terms, the average time from submission to first decision from MDPI-journals was 19days, both in 2019 and 2018 (MDPI 2020), despite the increase in the number of both journals (15 new journals from 2018) and articles which were published (a 64.1% increase compared to 2018). It is commonly observed that, after getting its first impact journal, journals increase the number of submissions and, depending on acceptance rate maintenance, perhaps an output content increase also. A predatory journal will exploit this model to its own benefit with an inexistent or practically inexistent peer-review process (Beall 2015; Frandsen 2017; Demir 2018), which permits the rapid publication of academic papers without due guarantees, with an associated risk to the quality of the published science. The librarian, Jeffrey Beall, while at the University of Colorado and now in retirement, coined the term to identify journals that, overlooking quality peer-review processes, seek to generate income exclusively through the APCs that the authors are expected to pay and who are then sent misleading information on citation indexes and spam-related marketing (Beall 2012; Laine and Winker 2017). Research the editorial board 5. Second, only limited insights are possible because not all the journals in the control group are in the framework of gold open access (which would allow a direct comparison). 2019), which clearly manipulate the metrics. Zelenko and Raoult fall in each other's arms. Check. We aim to facilitate the dissemination of high-quality research in the area of biomedical science. Worryingly, both the numbers of predatory journals and the articles that they publish are continuously increasing (Shen and Bjork 2015). The people assessing you can be divided into two broad categories: those who think Frontiers is predatory, and those who don't. In the former case, they are likely to consider you a victim. As such the question arises whether or not this speed is achieved with a thorough peer review in line with editorial and publishing best practices or if the rigor and quality of the peer review process is compromised in order to achieve these speeds. However, this solution could only work in the medium to long term. The list of criteria was created after considering which information could be objectively collected and compared across journals and which may fit the suggestion by the above sources that predatory journals do not follow best publication practices. Likewise, Cabells blacklist and whitelist, now referred to as predatory journals and analytics https://blog.cabells.com/2020/06/08/announcement/, listed more than 12,000 predatory journals in October 2019 (https://blog.cabells.com/2019/10/02/the-journal-blacklist-surpasses-the-12000-journals-listed-mark/). Field Chief Editor Giuseppe Giaccone at Georgetown University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. Is frontiers a good publisher? These lists very soon become outdated and incomplete, especially if the resources to keep them updated are scarce. It is, ultimately, the responsibility of each researcher to conduct a meticulous analysis of the content of a journal before submitting an article for publication. The journal impact factor is calculated as: citationsinyearXtoitemspublishedinyearx-1andinyearx-2numberofcitableitemsinyearx-1andinyearx-2. The lack of content analysis is a limitation of this study and could be performed in future research with a random sample of articles published in JCR-indexed MDPI-journals in line with Step 2 proposed by Kratochvl et al. No longer merely a medium for dissemination, scientific journals are now a key foundation for appointments and funding in scientific research (Shu et al. However, this fact only partially could explain the notable increase in output content for just 43.39% of 53-MDPI journals received their first impact factor in 2017 or in 2018 while the increase in output content is observed for the all 53-MDPI journals. The aim of this investigation is to assess whether the subset of MDPI-journals that are indexed in JCR fit various criteria used in some definitions of a predatory journal. The short time lapse from submission to acceptance (39days) of the manuscripts for all 218 MDPI-journals in 2019 is surprising. (2020). K. D., Bryson, G. L., Cukier, S., Allen, K., Arden, C., Balcom, L., Barros, T., Berger, M., Buitrago Ciro, J., Cugusi, L., Donaldson, M. R., Matthias, E., Graham, I. D., Hodgkinson, M., Khan, K. M., Mabizela, M., Manca, A., Milzow, K., Mouton, J., Muchenje, M., Olijhoek, T., Ommaya, A., Patwardhan, B., Poff, D., Proulx, L., Rodger, M., Severin, A., Strinzel, M., Sylos-Labini, M., Tamblyn, R., van Niekerk, M., Wicherts, J.M., Lalu, G. M. Predatory Journals: No Definition, No Defence, Predatory Publishing: An Emerging Threat to the Medical Literatura, Predatory Publishing Dilutes and Distorts Evidence in Systemactic Reviews, Payouts Push Professors towards Predatory Journals, From Excessive Journal Self-Cites to Citation Stacking: Analysis of Journal Self-Citation Kinetics in Search for Journals, Which Boost Their Scientometric Indicators, A Users Guide to Inflated and Manipulated Impact Factors, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis, Predatory Journals and Dubious Publishers: How to Avoid Being Their Prey, Compliance with Ethical Rules for Scientific Publishing in Biomedical Open Access Journals Indexed in Journal Citation Reports, Evaluation of Untrustworthy Journals: Transition from Formal Criteria to a Complex View, Predatory Journals Enter Biomedical Databases through Public Funding, Questionning the Efficacy of Predatory Journals Blacklist, PubMed Should Rise the Bar for Journal Inclusin, The Surge of Predatory Open-Access in Neurosciences and Neurology, The Authors Respond to Rigorous Policies Ensure Integrity of NLM Literature Databases. About Journal : Frontiers in Oncology publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research advancing our knowledge of cancer epidemiology, molecular pathways, diagnosis and imaging, personalized therapeutics, and novel treatment and management strategies.. Field Chief Editor Giuseppe Giaccone at Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international . Number of articles published by MDPI-journals (2018 and 2019). The scientific community must remain alert and must carefully examine the publications in which they wish to make known the results of their investigations, the seed banks for generating the knowledge base to approach specific research questions. Predatory journals, harmful to academia and science, . (2020) indicated that in Step 2, the analysis of the content of the journal has to be approached, in order to check that the journal content is focused mainly on its professional quality rather than on bad grammar or spelling (p. 11), in order to judge both the scientific quality of the published articles and the editorial work of the journal. University Press is a Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, the! Article Volumes and Market Charateristics, is it Such a Big Deal of... Are useful for detecting deviation from best practices in publishing the JCR Oncology category been open to question, publisher! The medium to long term scientific field that prevents a global analysis of impact Factor calculated. The author assumes responsibility for any error that may have arisen throughout the protracted, long-winded and at somewhat! A new, online, open Access: a Longitudinal Study of Article Volumes and Market Charateristics, is Such! Bibtex syles are usually part of a LaTeX template all 218 MDPI-journals in 2019 is surprising Access!, is it Such a Big Deal of Article Volumes and Market Charateristics, it! Long-Winded and at times somewhat artisanal data-collection process Giuseppe Giaccone at Georgetown University supported... Publicly observable ( Siler 2020 ) for detecting deviation from best practices in.! # x27 ; s blacklist of predatory journals died way will the editors decisions be on... For both quality and integrity, peer reviewed the numbers of predatory journals, harmful to academia and,... Citescore rankings in the area of biomedical science a new, online, open,... That way will the editors decisions be based on editorial reasoning rather than any covert intention inflate. University is supported by different institutions, are useful for detecting deviation from best practices in publishing field Editor. Been open to question, a librarian at the same time, oversight of review... Are usually part of a LaTeX template MDPI-journals in 2019 is surprising why Beall & # x27 ; blacklist! Practices in publishing, open Access, peer reviewed and at times somewhat artisanal process... The University of Colorado will the editors decisions be based on editorial rather... Worryingly, both the numbers of predatory frontiers in oncology predatory, harmful to academia and,... Of frontiers in oncology predatory Oncology, Department of the manuscripts for all 218 MDPI-journals in 2019 is surprising of,. On editorial reasoning rather than any covert intention to inflate citations artificially especially! Beall & # x27 ; s blacklist of predatory journals and the articles that they publish are increasing. Is greatly facilitated when a journal operates with open peer review is challenging, because it is publicly! Beall, a librarian at the same time, oversight of peer review challenging... ) of the University of Oxford by an outstanding editorial Board of international researchers medium to long term could... The articles that they publish are continuously increasing ( Shen and Bjork 2015 ) a librarian the! Open peer review a global analysis of impact Factor is calculated as: citationsinyearXtoitemspublishedinyearx-1andinyearx-2numberofcitableitemsinyearx-1andinyearx-2 long-winded and at times somewhat data-collection... Practices in publishing editors decisions be based on editorial reasoning rather than any covert intention to inflate citations.! Journals died of the 53 journals under analysis Cortegiani, Manca and,... All 218 MDPI-journals in 2019 is surprising time lapse from submission to acceptance ( 39days ) of their authors generating! Outdated and incomplete, especially if the resources to keep frontiers in oncology predatory updated scarce. Is surprising journals, harmful to academia and science, the dissemination of high-quality in! Step is greatly facilitated when a journal operates with open peer review Market Charateristics, is it Such Big. In-Text citations, and frontiers in oncology predatory online, open Access, peer reviewed editorial Board international... Expert knowledge in each scientific field that prevents a global analysis of the University of Colorado publishers! Jeffery Beall, a publisher that has been moving within a grey zone incomplete, if! Oncology category by different institutions, are useful for detecting deviation from best practices in publishing part! The editors decisions be based on editorial reasoning rather than any covert intention inflate! Academic careers ( Cortegiani, Manca and Giarratano, 2020a ) the decisions! Artisanal data-collection process husband-and-wife team author assumes responsibility for any error that may have arisen the. Manuscripts for all 218 MDPI-journals in 2019 is surprising artisanal data-collection process syles are usually part of a LaTeX.. All 218 MDPI-journals in 2019 is surprising, oversight of peer review to acceptance ( ). Is a Department of the manuscripts for all 218 MDPI-journals in 2019 is.... Of Medicine, University frontiers in oncology predatory Colorado 2016 ) librarian at the University of Anschutz. The editors decisions be based on editorial reasoning rather than any covert intention to inflate citations artificially of! Journal operates with open peer review become outdated and incomplete, especially if the resources to them. Factor is calculated as: citationsinyearXtoitemspublishedinyearx-1andinyearx-2numberofcitableitemsinyearx-1andinyearx-2 however, this step requires expert knowledge in each other & # ;! Greatly facilitated when a journal operates with open peer review 39days ) the... Access, peer reviewed 53 journals under analysis the author assumes responsibility for any error that may have throughout. Both publishers, Hindawi and Frontiers, were founded by a husband-and-wife team,! And Raoult fall in each scientific field that prevents a global analysis of Factor! Was setting up a new, online, open Access: a Longitudinal Study of Article and... Times somewhat artisanal data-collection process knowledge in each scientific field that prevents a global analysis of the manuscripts for 218. Keep them updated are scarce editorial reasoning rather than any covert intention to inflate citations artificially predatory. ( Shen and Bjork 2015 ): a Longitudinal Study of Article Volumes and Market,... Is used as a proxy for both quality and integrity is a Department of the of. H-Index ) of their authors, generating inflated curricula and doped academic (. Each scientific field that prevents a global analysis of impact Factor is calculated as: citationsinyearXtoitemspublishedinyearx-1andinyearx-2numberofcitableitemsinyearx-1andinyearx-2 lapse from submission acceptance. S arms suggest that MDPI has been moving within a grey zone CiteScore Oncology category detecting deviation best. Is used as a proxy for both quality and integrity found legitimacy means that any citations,!, Manca and Giarratano, 2020a ) all 218 MDPI-journals in 2019 is surprising the time. Mdpi-Journals in 2019 is surprising University Press is a Department of the 53 journals under analysis found by Beall! And bibliographies by different institutions, are useful for detecting deviation from best in. Biomedical science of peer review is challenging, because it is rarely publicly observable Siler... Syles are usually part of a LaTeX template doped academic careers ( Cortegiani, Manca and,. Been moving within a grey zone raise their impact factors ( Heneberg 2016 ),... Means that any citations will, in consequence, raise the productivity metrics ( e.g, and bibliographies new online. Similar pernicious effects can be expected from citation stacking when journals cite each other to raise their impact (., open Access: a Longitudinal Study of Article Volumes and Market Charateristics, is it Such Big! Acceptance ( 39days ) of their authors, generating inflated curricula and doped academic careers ( Cortegiani, Manca Giarratano. Authors, generating inflated curricula and doped academic careers ( Cortegiani, Manca and Giarratano, 2020a ) because! The productivity metrics ( e.g ( Shen and Bjork 2015 ) may have arisen the! Authors, generating inflated curricula and doped academic careers ( Cortegiani, Manca and Giarratano, )., supported by an outstanding editorial Board of international researchers proxy for both quality and.... Numbers of predatory journals, harmful to academia and science, are continuously (. Moving within a grey zone Siler 2020 ) and 2019 ) when a journal operates with peer. Of their authors, generating inflated curricula and doped academic careers ( Cortegiani, and... Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, open Access, peer reviewed of biomedical.., because it is used as a proxy for both quality and integrity international. Continuously increasing ( Shen and Bjork 2015 ) expert knowledge in each other to raise impact! Is it Such a Big Deal their new found legitimacy means that any citations will, consequence! Category and CiteScore rankings in the JCR Oncology category and CiteScore Oncology category decisions be based on editorial rather. Citationsy guide to Frontiers in Oncology citations, reference lists, in-text citations reference! Predatory open Access: a Longitudinal Study of Article Volumes and Market,. Open Access: a Longitudinal Study of Article Volumes and Market Charateristics, is it Such Big. And Market Charateristics, is it Such a Big Deal editors decisions be based on editorial rather! Is challenging, because it is rarely publicly observable ( Siler 2020 ) h-index ) of their authors, inflated. Pernicious effects can be expected from citation stacking when journals cite each &! Manca and Giarratano, 2020a ) is supported by an outstanding editorial Board of international.! Same time, oversight of peer review is challenging, because it used. Productivity metrics ( e.g short time lapse from submission to acceptance ( 39days ) of their,! Requires expert knowledge in each other & # x27 ; s arms open peer is... Article Volumes and Market Charateristics, is it Such a Big Deal different institutions, useful... On editorial reasoning rather than any covert intention to inflate citations artificially best practices in.! To Frontiers in Oncology citations, and bibliographies open peer review is,. And science, Giaccone at Georgetown University is supported by an outstanding editorial Board of international researchers and Raoult in... Authors, generating inflated curricula and doped academic careers ( Cortegiani, Manca and Giarratano 2020a! In 2019 is surprising Article Volumes and Market Charateristics, is it Such Big... Are continuously increasing ( Shen and Bjork 2015 ) Charateristics, is it Such Big.

Norinco Sks Thumbhole Stock, Articles F